| Home | Overview | Photos | Videos | Press | Philosophy | Past | Twitter Archive | G+ |
![]() |
The Case Against Marriage
An Unfinished Book by Glenn Campbell “Read it or weep!” Chapter 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Production Notes | College Lecture | Glenn's Home Page NOTE: This work has been ABANDONED as too long-winded and repetitive, but you are welcome to get whatever you can from it. The essential ideas are best summarized in a single page. Most of my new philosophical musings on relationships, etc. are now found in Kilroy Cafe. —GC, 5/09 |
If everything goes to plan, you will bond with your honey for life. By the time you get there, "life" will probably be about 150 years. Your brain will be stored in jar connected by wires to the internet. Your honey will occupy the jar beside you. There will probably be a wire directly between the two jars so you can nag and annoy each other more efficiently.
At that point, your bodies will become irrelevant. All that will matter will be your minds and the special language you have built with each other.
That's pretty much the way things are today. Once you have lived with someone for a while, you don't see their body anymore. They are essentially a gender-less brain in the jar beside you who you are communicating with through a special channel. Hopefully, your communication gets more and more subtle with time, to the point where it is almost telepathic. At the same time, you should be maintaining your own independent relationship with the rest of the world, so you actually have something to communicate about.
Even if sexual attraction brought you together, it is destined to fade into the background, and it is not what keeps you together. All that matters in the long run is the quality and usefulness of your communication. Your relationship will succeed or fail based on it.
A logical question, then, is whether sexual attraction is really the best criteria for choosing your mate to begin with.
It's an icky question. If the most important thing is talent, can that talent be enclosed in a physical package you do not find attractive? If the sexual attraction isn't there, but everything else is, should you close your eyes and dive in anyway?
Is it acceptable to fall in love with someone for their perceived physical beauty? Is this really a valid criteria? Does beauty count, or is it only a distraction?
People have no choice about the bodies they were born into. This is mainly determined by their genes. However, programmed into our nervous system are certain innate standards of beauty. A beautiful man or woman, as perceived by other humans, has facial features and body parts in the right proportions. These are our fashion models and movie stars. If someone's eyes are too far apart or too close together, it clashes with the image of beauty that our brain is programmed with. A person has absolutely no control over the spacing of their eyes, so is it fair to judge them by it?
For that matter, is it fair to discriminate based on any physical characteristic—age, height, weight, gender? If a woman will date only men who are taller than her, isn't she eliminating a significant portion of the talent pool? Can't a short man be just as good a communicator?
For that matter, why do you have to limit yourself to a single gender. If you are a man who is sexually attracted to women but another man comes along who meets all your other criteria, is it fair to "discriminate" against him solely because of his gender?
It's a touchy subject no one likes to think about. No one wants to discriminate, but the fact remains that you are attracted to some physical specimens and not others. Are you a sexist, heightist, weightist, ageist pig? Knowing that physical characteristics are going to fade into the background anyway, how do you reconcile your sexual preferences with the illogic of it all?
First, let's emphasize again: Love is not charity. You should never, ever fall in love with someone because you pity them, feel sorry for them or want to help them. Remember that you are engaging in love primarily to serve your own needs, not the other person's. (Of course, you also expect to pay a price for this service, which is to provide the same to them.) You also expect them to come up to speed on your needs relatively fast. You don't want to have to invest months or years in training; things should "click" from an early stage.
You also have to recognize that physical beauty can mask a lot of ugly things. A beautiful woman or handsome guy, defined by biological standards, can still be an asshole once you start living with them. In fact, too much objective beauty can be a warning sign. When someone is beautiful, they are tempted to skate by on their looks and are less likely to seek deeper kinds of accomplishment. Do you really want to be dating the Homecoming Queen or the class stud? There's a word to describe their probable personality: airhead!
The talent pool will always be limited, so you have to be open to a broad range of physical specimens: young/old, tall/short, svelt/tubby. But at what point does their weight tip the scales? Should a midget be dating a basketball star? Should you be considering someone with a good mind who you are only marginally attracted to? Remember that you are both going to end up in jars anyway.
To answer the question, we have to step back a bit. Remember that sex itself is pretty loony. Logically, our body shape shouldn't make any difference at all in our relations with others, but it does in the sexual arena. Over time, sex is going to be less and less relevant to a relationship, but it is important for getting it started.
Sex can be thought of as a tool—like a can opener—to help us get started at intimacy. It helps us overcome the substantial natural barriers between individuals. Without sex, you probably aren't going to achieve the level of intimacy necessary to start the special communication going.
Romantic intimacy is like nuclear fusion. You need a lot of energy to get the reaction started, but after a certain break-even point, the process is self-sustaining. Sexual attraction can provide that initial energy source.
If that's what you are using sex for, then your innate sexual preferences must be respected. Whatever turns you on has to be listened to (as long as it doesn't get too kinky). The fact that you are attracted to one body type and not another may not make a lot of logical sense, but if you ignore these feelings, then you'll be faking it, and you won't get very far in the intimacy game.
Continued in Chapter 16
| Home | Overview | Photos | Videos | Press | Philosophy | Past | Twitter Archive | G+ |